Hajar Khanmohammad, Ph.D
Reader:
Mehrdad Zarafshan, Ph.D
November, 2013
(در فایل دانلودی نام نویسنده موجود است)
تکه هایی از متن پایان نامه به عنوان نمونه :
(ممکن است هنگام انتقال از فایل اصلی به داخل سایت بعضی متون به هم بریزد یا بعضی نمادها و اشکال درج نشود ولی در فایل دانلودی همه چیز مرتب و کامل است)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents page
Acknowledgements………………………………………………………………………………..i
Dedication ……………………………………………………………………………………………ii
Table of contents…………………………………………………………………………………..iii
List of tables…………………………………………………………………………………………VI
List of figures……………………………………………………………………………………….vii
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………..viii
Chapter1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..1
1.1.Preliminaries…………………………………………………………………………………………………..2
1.2. Statement of the problem……………………………………………………………………………..3
1.3. Significance of the study………………………………………………………………………………..4
1.4. Purpose of the study and research questions………………………………………………..5
1.5. Research question ………………………………………………………………………………………..5
1.6. Research hypothesis……………………………………………………………………………………..5
1.7. Definition of key terms ……………………………………………………………………………..6
1.7. Limitations and delimitations………………………………………………………………………..6
Chapter 2. Review of the related literature ……………………………………..8
2.1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………….9
2.2. Cheating and its types…………………………………………………………9
2.3. Cause of cheating……………………………………………………………. 15
2.4. Application of cheating……………………………………………………… 18
2.5. Side effect of cheating………………………………………………………. 18
2.6. Feedback of cheating………………………………………………………… 21
2.7. Definition of rapport………………………………………………………..23
2.8. Benefits of building rapport between student and teacher……………………..23
2.9. Rapport- building strategies………………………………………………….24
2.10.Rapport, learning and teaching………………………………………………25
2.11. The relationship between student-teacher rapport …………………………35
Chapter3 Methodology………………………………………………………….37
3.1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………..40
3.2. Design ……………………………………………………………………….40
3.3. Participant…………………………………………………………….………41
3.4. Instrument……………………………………………………………………41
3.5. Rapport and cheating questionnaires……………………………………..41
3.6. Data collection procedure……………………………………………………42 3.7.
Data analysis procedure………………………………………………………42
Chapter 4 Data analysis and result ………………………………………………….…48
3.8. Introduction…………………………………………………………………49
Chapter 5 Discussion, Conclusion, Implications, and Suggestions ……………..62
3.10. Introduction………………………………………………………………..63
3.11. Discution……………………………………………………………………63
3.12. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………..63
3.13. Implication………………………………………………………………….63
3.14. Suggestion…………………………………………………………………64
Reference………………………………………………………………………….66
Appendix…………………………………………………………………………79
List of Tables
Table Page
Table 1. Students’ major in high school…………………………………………..45
Table 2. Students’ average in high school…………………………………………46
Table3. Item statistic………………………………………………………………46
Table4. Descriptive statistic for students’ rapport…………………………………47
Table5. Descriptive statistic for students’ cheating……………………………….48
Table6. Correlation between rapport and cheating………………………………..49
Table7. Nonparametric test for cheating and rapport……………………………..51
Table8. Kruskal-Wallis Test. Rapport ranks ……………………………………..52
Table9. Kruskal-Wallis Test. Cheating ranks……………………………………..53
Table10. Table of response frequency ……………………………………………54
Table11. Response percent………………………………………………………..54
List of Figures
Figures Page
Figure1. Correlation graph between relationship and cheating………………..50
Abstract
Cheating has become one of the major problems on many high schools and college campuses. It is most prevalent at the college level. However, there have been reports of cheating incidents occurring at high school level. This research quantitatively would study the relationship between teacher- student rapport and students willingness to cheat in English classes of Iranian high schools in Bandar Abbas, with an average of between 17-18 years of age. First, they were given two questionnaires to answer. One questionnaire about rapport and another about cheating. From data collected, using correlation coefficient it was made clear that there was not any significant relationship between teacher students rapport and students willingness to cheat( i.e.: whether it would increase or decrease cheating in exams). Studying the views of high school students on such a serious issue as cheating could be beneficial in looking at ways to prevent and address this problem in future.
Key words: academic dishonesty, rapport, cheating
Chapter I
Introduction
Introduction
Academic dishonesty or cheating is not restricted to a certain country or geographical area, but it is a universal phenomenon in educational